Articles

ANBIMA Study Maps Betting Patterns Among Brazilian Gamblers

Dana Sullivan · Sep 5, 2026

ANBIMA Study Maps Betting Patterns Among Brazilian Gamblers

Brazilian financial markets association releases gambling behavior study findings

Study Overview and Methodology

The Brazilian Financial and Capital Markets Association, known as ANBIMA, released findings from its latest research project that examined betting habits through in-depth interviews conducted with 60 current and former gamblers spread across all five regions of Brazil, and the work produced detailed profiles while highlighting specific risk levels within the participant group. Researchers worked with consultancy Kyvo to gather qualitative data that revealed four distinct betting personality profiles, and the results showed that 11 percent of those interviewed fell into a high-risk category for addiction even though the majority displayed no signs of problematic behavior. The study titled Online Betting in Brazil: User Profiles, Journeys and Behavioral Patterns emphasized education as the primary response rather than any form of prohibition.

Four Personality Profiles Identified

Analysis of the interview transcripts allowed researchers to group participants into four separate personality profiles based on motivations, frequency of play, and emotional responses to wins and losses, and these categories emerged consistently across different regions and demographic segments. Observers note that the profiles capture variations in how individuals approach betting as either entertainment, a potential income source, a social activity, or a more intense personal pursuit, while the distinctions help explain why certain behaviors stay controlled for most people yet escalate for a smaller subset. Data from the 60 interviews formed the foundation for these groupings, and the resulting framework provides regulators and financial educators with clearer targets for outreach programs that address specific needs instead of applying uniform restrictions.

Risk Levels and Behavioral Patterns

Eleven percent of the interviewed bettors met criteria for high addiction risk according to the assessment tools applied during the study, yet the remaining participants showed controlled engagement that did not interfere with daily responsibilities or financial stability, and this split challenges broader assumptions about widespread problems in the sector. Those who studied the transcripts found that high-risk individuals often combined multiple risk factors such as chasing losses and increasing stake sizes over time, whereas the larger group maintained set budgets and treated betting as occasional leisure without escalation. The research indicates that most participants maintained awareness of their spending limits and reported no negative impacts on work or family life, which aligns with the call for targeted financial education programs that reinforce responsible habits across all profile types.

Data visualization of betting personality profiles from ANBIMA research

Policy Recommendations from the Findings

ANBIMA researchers concluded that enhanced financial education offers a more effective path forward than prohibition measures because the data revealed that the majority of bettors already practice moderation when equipped with basic awareness tools, and the study recommends integrating modules on budgeting and probability into existing consumer protection initiatives. Experts who reviewed the transcripts highlighted that education campaigns tailored to each of the four profiles could address the 11 percent high-risk segment without restricting access for the rest of the population, and the approach avoids unintended consequences such as driving activity underground. The report points to existing successful models in other markets where education reduced escalation rates, and it suggests Brazil could adapt similar strategies through partnerships between financial associations and regulatory bodies.

Regional Consistency Across Brazil

Interviews conducted in all five Brazilian regions produced similar profile distributions and risk percentages, which indicates that betting behaviors follow patterns that transcend local economic differences or cultural variations, and this consistency strengthens the reliability of the overall findings. Participants from urban centers and smaller towns alike described comparable journeys from initial curiosity to established routines, while the 11 percent high-risk figure appeared uniformly rather than clustering in any single area. Researchers documented these parallels through direct quotes and timeline reconstructions that showed how external factors such as advertising reach or payment method availability influenced entry points but did not alter the core personality categories.

Conclusion

The ANBIMA study supplies concrete data on Brazilian betting behaviors through its interviews with 60 participants and delivers a structured view of four personality profiles alongside the 11 percent high-risk statistic, and the emphasis on financial education provides regulators with evidence-based direction. Observers note that the research challenges narratives of widespread addiction by documenting controlled behavior among most participants, while the call for education programs offers a practical response that matches the identified patterns. The findings remain available for further analysis by policymakers and industry stakeholders seeking to align interventions with actual participant profiles rather than generalized assumptions.